






   
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Legal Hukuk Dergisi, Year 2023 Issue 242 (ŞUBAT)</title>
    <link>https://basvuru.legaldergi.com.tr/?mod=sayi_detay&amp;sayi_id=2366</link>
    <description>Legal Hukuk Dergisi</description>
    <language>en</language>
    <pubDate>2024-08-29</pubDate>
    <generator/>
    <item>
      <title>DERIVATIVE REGULATION AUTHORITY AND LEGAL REGIME OF THE EXECUTIVE REGARDING JUDICIAL ISSUES IN THE PRESIDENTIAL GOVERNMENT SYSTEM</title>
      <link>https://basvuru.legaldergi.com.tr/?mod=makale_tr_ozet&amp;makale_id=65800</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://basvuru.legaldergi.com.tr/?mod=makale_tr_ozet&amp;makale_id=65800</guid>
      <author>ABDULVAHAP DARENDELİ</author>
      <description>The provisions regarding the constitutional amendments was accepted with the Law No.6771 in the Presidential Government System, which came into force in our country in2018, have brought important differentiations and changes to the agenda in terms ofregulatory action authority in functional sense, as well as the reorganization of theexecutive (administrative) in an organic sense.It is accepted that these amendments and transformations are affected by the secondaryfeature and legality of the executive's authority to make derivative regulations, andaccordingly the basic principles and criteria accepted in Turkish Administrative Law.In this regard, it is of great importance how the scope and results of the aforementionedeffects in matters related to the judicial field take place in both the doctrine and thedecisions of the judicial authorities (Constitutional Court and the Council of State), takinginto account the processes before 2017 and what they mean.</description>
      <pubDate>2024-08-29</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title/>
      <link>https://basvuru.legaldergi.com.tr/?mod=makale_tr_ozet&amp;makale_id=66086</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://basvuru.legaldergi.com.tr/?mod=makale_tr_ozet&amp;makale_id=66086</guid>
      <author>Sami Kocabıyık</author>
      <description>ABSTRACT&#13;
A trademark licence agreement is a contract where the trademark owner grants the licensee the right to use the trademark and the licensee generally undertakes to pay a licence fee. The licence agreement creates a continuous debt relationship between the parties. As with other continuous debt relations, the licence agreement may be terminated by ordinary or extraordinary termination. When terminating the licence agreement through ordinary termination, a period of time must be granted to the other party. The parties may agree on this period in the contract. However, if the parties have not agreed on a period of time, the party who declares termination must give at least six months to the other party to the contract. If the licence agreement is terminated through extraordinary termination, there is no need to grant a period of time, and the agreement ends as soon as the termination declaration reaches the other party.</description>
      <pubDate>2024-08-29</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS ON EVALUATION OF THE EXCEPTIONS OF PATENT-ELIGIBLE SUBJECT MATTERS AND THEIR SCOPE IN THE EPC AND US LAW</title>
      <link>https://basvuru.legaldergi.com.tr/?mod=makale_tr_ozet&amp;makale_id=64830</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://basvuru.legaldergi.com.tr/?mod=makale_tr_ozet&amp;makale_id=64830</guid>
      <author>Atilla Kasap</author>
      <description>Patents, being closely linked to industrial production and the application of intellectual property rights, encourage individuals to spend the effort to invent and innovate new goods and services. However, this requires a balance between rewarding inventors and considering public order, general morality, and general welfare. As global industries' leaders, Europe and the United States (US) depend on innovation for continued economic growth and industrial and social progress. As such, they set forth rules on patentable inventions to continue innovation in the industry. Comparing the limitations placed on patentable inventions in these two jurisdictions is necessary because inventions today have substantial commercial value at a global level, and compatible patentability criteria are of economic importance to companies and individuals operating across borders. In this article, the author compares the scope of patentable inventions in the European Union (EU) and the US, explains the emerging similarities and differences and how they have evolved throughout legislative and judicial history, and provide solutions to advance harmonization.</description>
      <pubDate>2024-08-29</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>CONDITIONS FOR BEING AN HERITOR IN NORTHERN CYPRUS LAW</title>
      <link>https://basvuru.legaldergi.com.tr/?mod=makale_tr_ozet&amp;makale_id=64229</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://basvuru.legaldergi.com.tr/?mod=makale_tr_ozet&amp;makale_id=64229</guid>
      <author>Fatma Alaslan</author>
      <description>Anyone who is alive at the time of the death of the legator, has the capacity to inherit and is not deprived of inheritance gains the title of heir. The Will and Inheritance Law, which includes the provisions of the law of inheritance in Northern Cyprus law, regulates the conditions under which the title of heir will be acquired. However, VVY, unlike Turkish law, made the acquisition of the title of heirship dependent on a single condition. This condition is the condition of having the capacity to inherit. However, in order to be able to talk about the ability to inherit, the condition of being alive and having the capacity to inherit must also be fulfilled. Because, it will not be possible for a person who is not alive at the time of the decedent's death or who does not have the capacity to inherit, to fulfill the conditions regarding the capacity of inheritance. Having the capacity of inheritance meets the concept of not being deprived of inheritance in Turkish legal teaching.&#13;
In our study, the conditions of being entitled to inheritance have been examined, by comparing the regulations in Northern Cyprus law and Turkish law, similar and different regulations have been revealed.</description>
      <pubDate>2024-08-29</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>


